# Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Llama 2-7B

> Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-advanced-vs-llama-2-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 48.5 to 28.0.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 197 | 317 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205)
- Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1002 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160)
- Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1009 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 99.06 |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |

## Math

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181)
- Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1042 |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1036 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini Advanced 0514: —
- Llama 2-7B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192)
- Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 973 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | 970 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1007 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212)
- Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1006 |

## Long Context

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207)
- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 999 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1029 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Llama 2-7B?

Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Llama 2-7B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.