# Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Llama 2-13B

> Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-advanced-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 48.5 to 29.8.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 29.6 |
| Rank | 197 | 309 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1062 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1051 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 106.17 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |

## Math

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181)
- Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1065 |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205)
- Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini Advanced 0514: —
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192)
- Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | 1044 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1087 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212)
- Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1045 |

## Long Context

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207)
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 1064 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200)
- Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1050 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Llama 2-13B?

Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Llama 2-13B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.