# Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-advanced-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 32.7.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 45.4 |
| Rank | 195 | 63 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.0 (#202)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 23.6 (#163)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1428 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |

## Math

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.9 (#181)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.7 (#201)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1439 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.8 (#187)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | 1306 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | 1356 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | 1329 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1407 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.2 (#206)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1403 |

## Long Context

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#202)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1254 | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.8 (#195)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1373 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1414 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.