# Gemini Advanced 0514 vs GLM-4.7

> GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-advanced-vs-glm-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.7 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.7 leads 47.0 to 32.7.
- GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 195 | 117 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.0 (#202)
- GLM-4.7: 43.6 (#74)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1435 |
| SciCode | — | 45.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 399.48 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini Advanced 0514: —
- GLM-4.7: 26.4 (#96)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 33.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,377 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 23.6 (#163)
- GLM-4.7: 23.7 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1443 |
| SimpleBench | — | 47.7% |
| CritPt | — | 1.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.53 |

## Math

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.9 (#181)
- GLM-4.7: 37.7 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1423 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 2.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.7 (#201)
- GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1424 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 32.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.7% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.8 (#187)
- GLM-4.7: 53.0 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | 1306 | 1432 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | 1439 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1423 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1433 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.2 (#206)
- GLM-4.7: 74.6 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1411 |

## Long Context

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#202)
- GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1254 | 1432 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.9% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 10.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.8 (#195)
- GLM-4.7: 61.1 (#89)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1413 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than GLM-4.7?

GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or GLM-4.7 better for coding?

GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and GLM-4.7 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7 has 36.