# Gemini 4 Argon vs Wizardlm 13b

> Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 30.2.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 4 Argon | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 24 | 274 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1035 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1018 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1017 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1048 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Wizardlm 13b?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 4 Argon or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.