# Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.7 Max

> Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 51.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-qwen3-7-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 2 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 49.2 to 22.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 99% for Gemini 4 Argon and 26% for Qwen3.7 Max.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 51.5 |
| Rank | 24 | 42 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | 1515 |
| SciCode | 61.8% | 48.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1498 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 27.1% | 13.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1483 |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.68 |

## Math

- Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 99% | 26% |
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1490 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1488 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
- Qwen3.7 Max: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1530 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1484 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1460 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1449 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1481 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 51.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 50.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.7 Max share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.