# Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen1.5-7B

> Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-qwen1-5-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 31.4.
- Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 24 | 273 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1107 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
- Qwen1.5-7B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1065 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1080 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
- Qwen1.5-7B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1006 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1058 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1090 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1062 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen1.5-7B?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen1.5-7B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.