# Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen1.5-110B

> Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-qwen1-5-110b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 33.7.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 34.2 |
| Rank | 24 | 234 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1184 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
- Qwen1.5-110B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1168 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |

## Math

- Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1185 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1144 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
- Qwen1.5-110B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1142 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1158 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen1.5-110B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.