# Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen Plus

> Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Plus in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 23.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 24 | 210 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1328 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |

## Math

- Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1323 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen Plus?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.