# Gemini 4 Argon vs Phi-2

> Gemini 4 Argon has enough public results to be ranked (#24); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-phi-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- Phi-2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 4 Argon | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | — |
| Rank | 24 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
- Phi-2: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 45.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 54.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
- Phi-2: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
- Phi-2: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 42.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 59.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 107.94 |
| HellaSwag | — | 53.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 54.7% |

## Math

- Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
- Phi-2: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1536 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
- Phi-2: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.9% |
| MMLU | — | 58.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 73.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 45.2% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
- Phi-2: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
- Phi-2: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
- Phi-2: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
- Phi-2: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
- Phi-2: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Phi-2?

Gemini 4 Argon has enough public results to be ranked (#24); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Phi-2 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.