# Gemini 4 Argon vs MiniMax-M2.1

> Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-minimax-m2-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 9 categories and MiniMax-M2.1 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 38.3.
- MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 4 Argon | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 38.9 |
| Rank | 24 | 178 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | 1384 |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1421 |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 623.83 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 36.6% |
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1411 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 11.2% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1397 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1431 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.8% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
- MiniMax-M2.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1430 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1397 |
| LMArena French | — | 1404 |
| LMArena German | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1298 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1400 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1361 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1396 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 4 Argon better than MiniMax-M2.1?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 4 Argon or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.