# Gemini 4 Argon vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 39.5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 24 | 103 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1476 |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |

## Math

- Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1447 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1478 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1456 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1469 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1445 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 4 Argon better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 4 Argon or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 43.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.