# Gemini 4 Argon vs MiMo-V2.5

> Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 43.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-mimo-v2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 9 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 36.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 99% for Gemini 4 Argon and 16% for MiMo-V2.5.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 43.4 |
| Rank | 24 | 93 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
- MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | 1438 |
| SciCode | 61.8% | 43.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1469 |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
- MiMo-V2.5: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
- MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 27.1% | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1450 |

## Math

- Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
- MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 99% | 16% |
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1436 |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
- MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1460 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
- MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
- MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1468 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1416 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
- MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1434 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
- MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1445 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
- MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1445 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 4 Argon better than MiMo-V2.5?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 43.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 4 Argon or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 43.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and MiMo-V2.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.