# Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5 Pro

> Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 46.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-gpt-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 48.5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 46.4 |
| Rank | 24 | 64 |
| Context | — | 400K |
| Input $/M | — | $15 |
| Output $/M | — | $120 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
- GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 60.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | — |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.31 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
- GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 18.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 61.6% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 76.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 70.2% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 18.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 150.28 |

## Math

- Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
- GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 55.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 19.5% |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1536 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
- GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GPT-5 Pro?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 46.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-5 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5 Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Pro has 12.