# Gemini 4 Argon vs GLM-5V-Turbo

> Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-glm-5v-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 9 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 39.4.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 43.8 |
| Rank | 24 | 84 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | 1401 |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1466 |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1443 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1441 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1452 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1488 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1431 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1450 |
| LMArena French | — | 1444 |
| LMArena German | — | 1423 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1423 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1438 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1416 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1432 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GLM-5V-Turbo?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 4 Argon or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and GLM-5V-Turbo share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.