# Gemini 4 Argon vs GLM-4.6

> Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-glm-4-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 9 categories and GLM-4.6 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 39.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 27.1% for Gemini 4 Argon and 1.1% for GLM-4.6.
- GLM-4.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 41.4 |
| Rank | 24 | 135 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
- GLM-4.6: 40.1 (#148)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | 1340 |
| SciCode | 61.8% | 38.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1449 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 340.82 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
- GLM-4.6: 32.3 (#66)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 24.5% |
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 72.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
- GLM-4.6: 23.7 (#172)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 27.1% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1440 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 47.4% |

## Math

- Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
- GLM-4.6: 39.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1432 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
- GLM-4.6: 40.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1431 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.5% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
- GLM-4.6: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
- GLM-4.6: 53.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1499 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1419 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1436 |
| LMArena French | — | 1459 |
| LMArena German | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
- GLM-4.6: 74.3 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1410 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
- GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1422 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
- GLM-4.6: 61.1 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1440 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1427 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1411 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GLM-4.6?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 4 Argon or GLM-4.6 better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and GLM-4.6 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6 has 29.