# Gemini 4 Argon vs GLM-4.5V

> Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-glm-4-5v
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 9 categories and GLM-4.5V in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 37.4.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 39.8 |
| Rank | 24 | 158 |
| Context | — | 64K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1347 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
- GLM-4.5V: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1354 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1353 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1336 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1311 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1304 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1332 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GLM-4.5V?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 4 Argon or GLM-4.5V better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and GLM-4.5V share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.