# Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemma 2 27B

> Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-gemma-2-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 2 27B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 10.7.
- Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 29.4 |
| Rank | 24 | 312 |
| Context | — | 8K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.65 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.65 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
- Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1211 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 42.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 36% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
- Gemma 2 27B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
- Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1198 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 28.1% |
| DTBench | — | 48% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 47.9% |
| LMCA | — | 7.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.08 |
| LiveBench | — | 38.2% |

## Math

- Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
- Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1212 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.4% |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 26.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 27.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
- Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1172 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 36.5% |
| Confabulations | — | 27.1% |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
- Gemma 2 27B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
- Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1217 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1221 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1228 |
| LMArena French | — | 1247 |
| LMArena German | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1174 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
- Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1206 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.1% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1231 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
- Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1231 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1241 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1224 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 32.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Gemma 2 27B?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 4 Argon or Gemma 2 27B better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Gemma 2 27B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 27B has 34.