# Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemma 2 27B

> Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.7 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-pro-vs-gemma-2-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 2 27B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3 Pro leads 64.3 to 18.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 91.4% for Gemini 3 Pro and 1.4% for Gemma 2 27B.
- Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 54.7 | 29.2 |
| Rank | 23 | 302 |
| Context | — | 8K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.65 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.65 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3 Pro: 52.1 (#33)
- Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1482 | 1211 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 72.9% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 74.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1439 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 68.7% | — |
| GSO | 18.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 69.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 42.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 36% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.5% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,177 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.83 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3 Pro: 40.5 (#21)
- Gemma 2 27B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 69.4% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 72.5% | — |
| GDPval | 40.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 1.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 80.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 18% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 75.9% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 91% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 46.3% | — |
| BALROG | 58.1% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1207 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 71% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,478 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3 Pro: 52.5 (#28)
- Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1199 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.96 | 122.06 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 31.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 94.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 75% | — |
| CritPt | 6.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 31% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 18.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 28.1% |
| DTBench | — | 48% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 47.9% |
| LMCA | — | 7.1% |
| ForecastBench | 61.2 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 38.2% |

## Math

- Gemini 3 Pro: 48.8 (#50)
- Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.4% | 1.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1212 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67% | — |
| ProofBench | 20% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 55.5% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 26.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 27.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 37.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 18.8% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3 Pro: 64.3 (#15)
- Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.6% | 36.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1475 | 1172 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 37.5% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 90.3% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 27.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 13.6% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 80.3% | — |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3 Pro: 56.9 (#1)
- Gemma 2 27B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1305 | — |
| GeoBench | 84% | — |
| VPCT | 91% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1434 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3 Pro: 57.1 (#14)
- Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1217 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1522 | 1221 |
| LMArena French | 1492 | 1246 |
| LMArena German | 1517 | 1209 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1513 | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | 1449 | 1174 |
| LMArena Russian | 1493 | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1468 | 1228 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3 Pro: 76.4 (#42)
- Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1458 | 1206 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.1% |
| IFEval | 87.7% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3 Pro: 44.0 (#75)
- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1472 | 1231 |
| CL-bench | 15.8% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3 Pro: 66.6 (#34)
- Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1479 | 1231 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 1241 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1484 | 1224 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1525 | — |
| WildBench | 85.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 32.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3 Pro better than Gemma 2 27B?

Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.7 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 3 Pro or Gemma 2 27B better for coding?

Gemini 3 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.1 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Pro and Gemma 2 27B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Pro has 67 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 27B has 34.