# Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-flash-preview-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads 51.5 to 22.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SWE-bench Verified (bash only): 75.8% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and 9% for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is cheaper at $0.66 / $1 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview.
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 33K.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 32.9 |
| Rank | 33 | 239 |
| Context | 1.05M | 33K |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | $3 | $1 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.5 (#35)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.4 (#328)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | 9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1460 | 1276 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.4% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1439 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 72.7% | — |
| GSO | 9.8% | — |
| WeirdML | 61.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,367 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.6 (#27)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 64.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 82.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 27.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 76.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 91.2% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 49.8% | — |
| BALROG | 48.1% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1198 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,635 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#35)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 20.4 (#220)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1465 | 1251 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.83 | 119.41 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 33.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 83.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 40% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 26% | — |
| DTBench | 89.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| LMCA | 43.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.5 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |

## Math

- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.4 (#42)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 30.8 (#203)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1472 | 1251 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 15% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 35.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#30)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 32.9 (#200)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1461 | 1221 |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 13.5% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.3 (#15)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1285 | — |
| GeoBench | 88% | — |
| VPCT | 72.6% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1413 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.9 (#26)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#230)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1458 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1510 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | 1228 |
| LMArena French | 1478 | — |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1488 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1470 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.8 (#52)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#63)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1452 | 1251 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.6 (#44)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1466 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1457 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is cheaper. It lists at $0.66 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens; Gemini 3 Flash Preview lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.5 versus 22.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.