# Gemini 3.8 Flash vs QwQ-32B

> Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and QwQ-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 64.7 to 22.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 61% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 5% for QwQ-32B.
- QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.8 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 59.5 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 13 | 153 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.75 | — |
| Output $/M | $3.75 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 56.4 (#17)
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1512 | 1333 |
| DeepSWE | 73.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 41.2% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| CursorBench | 39.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1581 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 19.6% | — |
| SciCode | 56.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,270 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.3 (#22)
- QwQ-32B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 64.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 23.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,094 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 64.7 (#13)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1506 | 1326 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 157.13 | 137.6 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| CritPt | 18.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 47% | — |
| DTBench | 95.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| LMCA | 52.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 76.9% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.2 (#22)
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | 59.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1528 | 1359 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 68.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 22% | — |
| ProofBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.9 (#2)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | 65.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1529 | 1323 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.7% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.9 (#33)
- QwQ-32B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1312 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 38.6% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 31.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 57.9 (#5)
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1486 | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1547 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1502 | 1337 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1505 | 1263 |
| LMArena Korean | 1479 | 1278 |
| LMArena Russian | 1507 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1492 | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.2 (#11)
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1489 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.2 (#23)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1506 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.1 (#16)
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1494 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1485 | 1288 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1748 | 1257 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1503 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than QwQ-32B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or QwQ-32B better for coding?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.4 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and QwQ-32B share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 46 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.