# Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

> Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-vs-qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 64.7 to 24.7.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 59.5 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 13 | 186 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.75 | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | $3.75 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 56.4 (#17)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1581 | 1275 |
| LMArena Coding | 1512 | 1413 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,270 | 461.45 |
| DeepSWE | 73.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 41.2% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| CursorBench | 39.6% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 19.6% | — |
| SciCode | 56.6% | — |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.2% |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.3 (#22)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
| APEX-Agents | 64.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 23.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,094 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 64.7 (#13)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1506 | 1372 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| CritPt | 18.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 47% | — |
| DTBench | 95.7% | — |
| LMCA | 52.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 76.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 157.13 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.2 (#22)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1528 | 1364 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 68.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 22% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 48% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.9 (#2)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1529 | 1337 |
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.9 (#33)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1312 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 38.6% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 31.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 57.9 (#5)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1486 | 1345 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1547 | 1356 |
| LMArena French | 1502 | 1394 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1324 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1505 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1479 | 1307 |
| LMArena Russian | 1507 | 1367 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1492 | 1360 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.2 (#11)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1489 | 1356 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.2 (#23)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1506 | 1379 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.1 (#16)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1494 | 1356 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1485 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1503 | 1365 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1748 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

### Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.4 versus 36.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.8 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.