# Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B

> Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 46.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-vs-qwen3-8-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 31

## Summary

- They share 31 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3.8 27B in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 76.9 to 41.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 89.2% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 42.4% for Qwen3.8 27B.
- Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper at $0.99 / $1.49 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Qwen3.8 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 61.8 | 46.0 |
| Rank | 11 | 68 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.75 | $0.99 |
| Output $/M | $3.75 | $1.49 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.2 (#15)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 50.5 (#44)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1584 | 1593 |
| SciCode | 56.6% | 46.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1510 | 1482 |
| DeepSWE | 73.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 41.2% | — |
| CursorBench | 39.6% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 19.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 84.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,270 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 41.8 (#21)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 32.9 (#57)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 64.3% | 47.5% |
| Remote Labor Index | 5.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 23.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,094 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.9 (#5)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 41.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | 42.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | 54.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | 87.5% |
| CritPt | 18.3% | 5.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1508 | 1460 |
| DTBench | 95.7% | 88% |
| LMCA | 52.9% | 41.4% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 76.9% | 45% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.71 | 149.38 |
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 47% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3 (#28)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 37.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 48% | 16% |
| LMArena Math | 1528 | 1456 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 68.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 22% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.8 (#2)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 41.6 (#109)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1524 | 1482 |
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.7 (#45)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 41.3 (#37)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1314 | 1271 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 38.6% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 31.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 58.0 (#5)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 53.7 (#60)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1491 | 1430 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1554 | 1504 |
| LMArena French | 1498 | 1465 |
| LMArena German | 1493 | 1438 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1502 | 1384 |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | 1393 |
| LMArena Russian | 1515 | 1415 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1485 | 1448 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.0 (#13)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1439 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.3 (#24)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1508 | 1450 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2 (#15)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 65.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1499 | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1492 | 1384 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1748 | 1671 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1501 | 1441 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 46.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.99 per million input tokens and $1.49 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.8 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

### Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3.8 27B better for coding?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.2 versus 50.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.8 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8 27B share?

31 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 50 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 31.