# Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.8 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 30

## Summary

- They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 1 category; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 76.9 to 39.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 61% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 24% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 61.8 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 11 | 72 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.75 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $3.75 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.2 (#15)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 41.2% | 10.2% |
| SciCode | 56.6% | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1510 | 1473 |
| DeepSWE | 73.8% | — |
| CursorBench | 39.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1584 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 19.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 84.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,270 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 41.8 (#21)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 64.3% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| Remote Labor Index | 5.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 23.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,094 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.9 (#5)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | 74.8% |
| CritPt | 18.3% | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | 24% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1508 | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 47% | 17% |
| DTBench | 95.7% | 84% |
| LMCA | 52.9% | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.71 | 147.37 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 76.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3 (#28)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 68.4% | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1528 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 22% | — |
| ProofBench | 48% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.8 (#2)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1524 | 1467 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.7 (#45)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1314 | 1279 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 38.6% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 31.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 58.0 (#5)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1491 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1554 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1498 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1493 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1502 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1515 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1485 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.0 (#13)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1440 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.3 (#24)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1508 | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2 (#15)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1499 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1492 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1501 | 1460 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1748 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.8 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.8 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

### Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.2 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.8 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

30 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 50 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.