# Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

> Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3-30B-A3B costs 7.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.8 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-vs-qwen3-30b-a3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 26

## Summary

- They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 76.9 to 22.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 84.8% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 29.8% for Qwen3-30B-A3B.
- Qwen3-30B-A3B is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 41K.
- Qwen3-30B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 61.8 | 38.9 |
| Rank | 11 | 179 |
| Context | 1.05M | 41K |
| Input $/M | $0.75 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $3.75 | $0.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.2 (#15)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 56.6% | 33.3% |
| WeirdML | 84.8% | 29.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1510 | 1416 |
| DeepSWE | 73.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 41.2% | — |
| CursorBench | 39.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1584 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 19.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,270 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 41.8 (#21)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 64.3% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41.4% |
| Remote Labor Index | 5.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 23.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,094 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.9 (#5)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 18.3% | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | 8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1508 | 1398 |
| DTBench | 95.7% | 69.3% |
| LMCA | 52.9% | 22.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.71 | 139.63 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 47% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 76.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3 (#28)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | 70.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1528 | 1394 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 68.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 22% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 47.8% |
| ProofBench | 48% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.8 (#2)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | 70.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1524 | 1396 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.7% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 12.3% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.7 (#45)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1314 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 38.6% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 31.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 58.0 (#5)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1491 | 1372 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1554 | 1433 |
| LMArena French | 1498 | 1418 |
| LMArena German | 1493 | 1380 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1502 | 1337 |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | 1515 | 1370 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1485 | 1404 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.0 (#13)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1363 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.3 (#24)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1508 | 1379 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 40.6% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2 (#15)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1499 | 1384 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1492 | 1317 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1501 | 1378 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 75.3% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1748 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3-30B-A3B costs 7.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.8 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.8 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

### Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.2 versus 37.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.8 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 41K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

26 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 50 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.