# Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT

> Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.8 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-vs-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 27

## Summary

- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 76.9 to 21.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 61% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 6% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.09 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 61.8 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 11 | 92 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.75 | $0.09 |
| Output $/M | $3.75 | $0.30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.2 (#15)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1584 | 1359 |
| SciCode | 56.6% | 40% |
| WeirdML | 84.8% | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1510 | 1447 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,270 | 927.17 |
| DeepSWE | 73.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 41.2% | — |
| CursorBench | 39.6% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 19.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 41.8 (#21)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 64.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 5.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 23.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,094 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.9 (#5)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 18.3% | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | 6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1508 | 1439 |
| DTBench | 95.7% | 74.9% |
| LMCA | 52.9% | 29.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.71 | 141.85 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 47% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 76.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3 (#28)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | 82.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1528 | 1470 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 68.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 22% | — |
| ProofBench | 48% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.8 (#2)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | 73.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1524 | 1447 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.7 (#45)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1314 | 1260 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 38.6% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 31.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 58.0 (#5)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1491 | 1421 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1554 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | 1498 | 1460 |
| LMArena Russian | 1515 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1485 | 1417 |
| LMArena German | 1493 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1502 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.0 (#13)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.3 (#24)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1508 | 1428 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2 (#15)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1499 | 1434 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1492 | 1402 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1748 | 1305 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1501 | 1441 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.8 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.8 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

### Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better for coding?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.2 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.8 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT share?

27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 50 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28.