# Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Max

> Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 51.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-7-flash-vs-qwen3-7-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 28

## Summary

- They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.1 to 48.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 58% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 26% for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 59.8 | 51.4 |
| Rank | 11 | 35 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.75 | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | $3.75 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 55.7 (#19)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1593 | 1515 |
| SciCode | 59.8% | 48.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1499 | 1498 |
| ALE-Bench | 904.3 | 1,189 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| DeepSWE | 65.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 43.6% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 20.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.2 (#18)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 67.8% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 5% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |
| GDP.pdf | 23.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.1 (#12)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 94% | 85.1% |
| CritPt | 14.3% | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | 19% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1497 | 1483 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 37% | 32% |
| DTBench | 96.8% | 92.3% |
| LMCA | 50.4% | 44% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 157.72 | 153.74 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 95.5% | — |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |

## Math

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.5 (#18)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 71.6% | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 36.6% | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.2% | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | 58% | 26% |
| LMArena Math | 1511 | 1488 |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8 (#4)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.8% | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.2% | 55.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1508 | 1488 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 36.9 (#69)
- Qwen3.7 Max: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1314 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.8 (#7)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1485 | 1475 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1553 | 1533 |
| LMArena Russian | 1519 | 1482 |
| LMArena French | 1512 | — |
| LMArena German | 1485 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1506 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1486 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1507 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 78.0 (#12)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1486 | 1460 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.8 (#28)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1493 | 1484 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.4 (#19)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1487 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1490 | 1450 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1495 | 1482 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1723 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 51.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

### Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.7 versus 50.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.