# Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 27× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-7-flash-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 28.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 71.6% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 19.3% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
- Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 59.8 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 14 | 156 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.75 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $3.75 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 65.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 43.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1592 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 20.3% | — |
| SciCode | 59.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1497 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 904.3 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 67.8% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 5% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 23.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 94% | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 37% | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 157.27 | 144.64 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 95.5% | — |
| CritPt | 14.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1494 | — |
| DTBench | 96.8% | — |
| LMCA | 50.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 71.6% | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.2% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 36.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 58% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1507 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.8% | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1508 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1316 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1484 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1548 | — |
| LMArena French | 1505 | — |
| LMArena German | 1498 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1483 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1516 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1503 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1483 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1492 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1486 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1490 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1723 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1489 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 27× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.