# Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5 Plus costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-7-flash-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 32.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleQA Verified: 69.2% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 25.4% for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
- Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 59.8 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 14 | 106 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.75 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $3.75 | $2.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 904.3 | 621.92 |
| DeepSWE | 65.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 43.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1592 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 20.3% | — |
| SciCode | 59.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1497 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 67.8% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 5% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 23.8% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | 22% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 37% | 17% |
| DTBench | 96.8% | 80.5% |
| LMCA | 50.4% | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 157.27 | 146.78 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 94% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 95.5% | — |
| CritPt | 14.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1494 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.2% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 71.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 36.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 58% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1507 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.8% | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.2% | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1508 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1316 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1484 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1548 | — |
| LMArena French | 1505 | — |
| LMArena German | 1498 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1483 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1516 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1503 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1483 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1492 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1486 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1490 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1723 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1489 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5 Plus costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.