# Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Grok 4.6

> Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 54.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.6 Flash costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.6's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-6-flash-vs-grok-4-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 44

## Summary

- They share 44 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher in 5 categories and Grok 4.6 in 5 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.6 leads 66.8 to 57.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DeepSWE: 46.7% for Gemini 3.6 Flash and 67.5% for Grok 4.6.
- Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.6.
- Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 500K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 54.1 | 56.8 |
| Rank | 30 | 19 |
| Context | 1.05M | 500K |
| Input $/M | $0.75 | $2 |
| Output $/M | $3.75 | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.6 Flash: 49.6 (#45)
- Grok 4.6: 58.0 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 46.7% | 67.5% |
| FrontierCode | 34.4% | 48% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1536 | 1620 |
| SciCode | 52.7% | 56.5% |
| WeirdML | 56.1% | 67.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | 1464 |
| ALE-Bench | 715.52 | 1,508 |
| CursorBench | — | 41.4% |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.6 Flash: 32.4 (#56)
- Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#25)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 46.9% | 65.3% |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | 17.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 9,047 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.6 Flash: 58.9 (#20)
- Grok 4.6: 61.3 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 60.4% | 67.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89% | 80% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 91.2% | 87.5% |
| CritPt | 10.6% | 19.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 43% | 40% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | 1445 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | 34% |
| DTBench | 95.5% | 97.3% |
| LMCA | 44.9% | 48.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.36 | 156.48 |
| SimpleBench | — | 75.9% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 30.5% |

## Math

- Gemini 3.6 Flash: 57.0 (#33)
- Grok 4.6: 66.8 (#19)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 58.9% | 66% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 22% | 31.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.2% | 99.2% |
| ProofBench | 36% | 51% |
| LMArena Math | 1504 | 1416 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 70.8% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.6 Flash: 67.8 (#7)
- Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.1% | 94% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | 49.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1489 | 1463 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.6 Flash: 38.7 (#55)
- Grok 4.6: 43.9 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1297 | 1265 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 31.2% | 33.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | 23.3% | 40% |
| LMArena Document | 1456 | 1452 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.6 Flash: 56.8 (#17)
- Grok 4.6: 53.3 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1470 | 1422 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1530 | 1479 |
| LMArena French | 1501 | 1458 |
| LMArena German | 1478 | 1425 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1477 | 1383 |
| LMArena Korean | 1435 | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | 1490 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1477 | 1408 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.6 Flash: 77.2 (#27)
- Grok 4.6: 75.6 (#59)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1467 | 1431 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.6 Flash: 45.1 (#47)
- Grok 4.6: 44.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1475 | 1453 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.6 Flash: 68.3 (#26)
- Grok 4.6: 62.5 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1478 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1464 | 1430 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | 1422 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1604 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.6 Flash better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 54.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.6 Flash costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.6's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Grok 4.6?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Grok 4.6 lists at $2 and $6.

### Is Gemini 3.6 Flash or Grok 4.6 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 49.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.6 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.6 Flash and Grok 4.6 share?

44 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.6 Flash has 46 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.