# Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Max

> Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 51.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-qwen3-7-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 33

## Summary

- They share 33 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.7 to 48.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 50% for Gemini 3.5 Flash and 19% for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $1.50 / $9 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 54.1 | 51.4 |
| Rank | 29 | 35 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | $9 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.1 (#46)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.3% | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | 1515 |
| SciCode | 53.1% | 48.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | 1498 |
| ALE-Bench | 911.02 | 1,189 |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.8 (#107)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 6.7% | 0.4% |
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,396 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.7 (#16)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | 70.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.6% | 85.1% |
| CritPt | 13.1% | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 50% | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | 4.8% | 9.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1483 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | 32% |
| DTBench | 94.7% | 92.3% |
| LMCA | 47.1% | 44% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.55 | 153.74 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 92.5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 25.4% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.5 (#30)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 62.8% | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | 31% | 26% |
| LMArena Math | 1502 | 1488 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#10)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | 55.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1493 | 1488 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#13)
- Qwen3.7 Max: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1311 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.1 (#12)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | 1475 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1525 | 1533 |
| LMArena Russian | 1491 | 1482 |
| LMArena French | 1490 | — |
| LMArena German | 1500 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1481 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1453 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1478 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.2 (#29)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | 1460 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.3 (#39)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1481 | 1484 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#46)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1481 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1467 | 1450 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1087 | 1110 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1482 | 1482 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 51.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $1.50 per million input tokens and $9 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.2 versus 49.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max share?

33 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.