# Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6 Flash

> Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.6 Flash costs 8.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-qwen3-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.7 to 28.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleQA Verified: 66.2% for Gemini 3.5 Flash and 15.9% for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.19 / $1.13 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $9 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 54.1 | 38.4 |
| Rank | 29 | 176 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | $9 | $1.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.1 (#46)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 911.02 | 326.4 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.3% | — |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | — |
| SciCode | 53.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.8 (#107)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 6.7% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,396 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.7 (#16)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | 50% | 20% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | 18% |
| DTBench | 94.7% | 77.1% |
| LMCA | 47.1% | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.55 | 143.26 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 92.5% | — |
| CritPt | 13.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 25.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 4.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.5 (#30)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 62.8% | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | 0% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.3% | — |
| ProofBench | 31% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1502 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#10)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1493 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#13)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1311 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.1 (#12)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1525 | — |
| LMArena French | 1490 | — |
| LMArena German | 1500 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1481 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1453 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1478 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.2 (#29)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.3 (#39)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1481 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#46)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1481 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1467 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1087 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1482 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.6 Flash costs 8.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3.6 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.19 per million input tokens and $1.13 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash lists at $1.50 and $9.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.