# Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen Max

> Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 60.7 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 95.6% for Gemini 3.5 Flash and 16.1% for Qwen Max.
- Qwen Max is cheaper at $1.60 / $6.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $9 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 54.2 | 34.7 |
| Rank | 32 | 230 |
| Context | 1.05M | 33K |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | $9 | $6.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49)
- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | 1288 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.3% | — |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | — |
| SciCode | 53.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 911.02 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114)
- Qwen Max: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 6.7% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,396 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18)
- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1269 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 92.5% | — |
| CritPt | 13.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 50% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 25.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 4.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 47.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.46 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36)
- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1504 | 1275 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | 1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 62.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.3% | — |
| ProofBench | 31% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1495 | 1248 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15)
- Qwen Max: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1310 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13)
- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1476 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1526 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1490 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1492 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1486 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1451 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1493 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30)
- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1467 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47)
- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1482 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1470 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | 1277 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1087 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Qwen Max?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is cheaper. It lists at $1.60 per million input tokens and $6.40 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash lists at $1.50 and $9.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen Max better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen Max share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.