# Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 66.3 to 19.2.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 54.1 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 29 | 248 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $9 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.1 (#46)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | 1210 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.3% | — |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | — |
| SciCode | 53.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 911.02 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.8 (#107)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 6.7% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,396 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.7 (#16)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1208 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 92.5% | — |
| CritPt | 13.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 50% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 25.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 4.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 47.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.55 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.5 (#30)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1502 | 1208 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 62.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 31% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#10)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1493 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#13)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1311 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.1 (#12)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1525 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1491 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1490 | — |
| LMArena German | 1500 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1481 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1453 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1478 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.2 (#29)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.3 (#39)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1481 | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#46)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1481 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1467 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1482 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1087 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.1 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.