# Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super

> Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 20× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-nemotron-3-super
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.8 to 18.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 92.6% for Gemini 3.5 Flash and 15.4% for Nemotron 3 Super.
- Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $9 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 54.2 | 40.1 |
| Rank | 32 | 153 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | $0.08 |
| Output $/M | $9 | $0.45 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 53.1% | 36% |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | 38% |
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | 1403 |
| ALE-Bench | 911.02 | 213.9 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.3% | — |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114)
- Nemotron 3 Super: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 6.7% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,396 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.6% | 15.4% |
| CritPt | 13.1% | 3.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1386 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 92.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 50% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 25.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 4.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 47.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.46 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.3% | 60.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1504 | 1380 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 62.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 31% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1495 | 1398 |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15)
- Nemotron 3 Super: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1310 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1476 | 1355 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1526 | 1432 |
| LMArena French | 1490 | 1405 |
| LMArena German | 1492 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1493 | 1336 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1486 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1451 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1467 | 1347 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1362 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1482 | 1378 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1470 | 1317 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | 1369 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1087 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Nemotron 3 Super?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 20× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash lists at $1.50 and $9.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 39.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Nemotron 3 Super share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.