# Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 19× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.8 to 24.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 53.1% for Gemini 3.5 Flash and 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $9 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 54.2 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 32 | 138 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $9 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | 1330 |
| SciCode | 53.1% | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | 911.02 | 737.95 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.3% | — |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 6.7% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,396 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 13.1% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1420 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 92.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 50% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 25.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 4.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 47.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.46 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1504 | 1396 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 62.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 31% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1495 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1310 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1476 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1526 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1490 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1492 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1486 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1451 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1493 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1467 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1482 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1470 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | 1404 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1087 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 19× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash lists at $1.50 and $9.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.