# Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 46.7 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs 6.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 5 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.7 to 30.4.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $9 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 54.1 | 46.7 |
| Rank | 29 | 55 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $9 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.1 (#46)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | 1618 |
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | 1538 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.3% | — |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | — |
| SciCode | 53.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 911.02 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.8 (#107)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 6.7% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,396 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.7 (#16)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1511 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 92.5% | — |
| CritPt | 13.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 50% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 25.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 4.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 47.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.55 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.5 (#30)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1502 | 1497 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 62.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 31% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#10)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1493 | 1548 |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#13)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1311 | 1265 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.1 (#12)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1525 | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | 1491 | 1481 |
| LMArena French | 1490 | — |
| LMArena German | 1500 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1481 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1453 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1478 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.2 (#29)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | 1490 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.3 (#39)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1481 | 1500 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#46)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1481 | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1467 | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1482 | 1463 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1087 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 46.7 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs 6.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash lists at $1.50 and $9.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 49.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.