# Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Grok 4.1 Fast

> Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index. Grok 4.1 Fast costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-grok-4-1-fast
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 27

## Summary

- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and Grok 4.1 Fast in 1 category; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 66.3 to 32.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 31% for Gemini 3.5 Flash and 4% for Grok 4.1 Fast.
- Grok 4.1 Fast is cheaper at $0.20 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $9 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 54.1 | 40.9 |
| Rank | 29 | 131 |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | $0.20 |
| Output $/M | $9 | $0.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.1 (#46)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.8 (#236)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | 1241 |
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | 1411 |
| ALE-Bench | 911.02 | 394.93 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.3% | — |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | — |
| SciCode | 53.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.8 (#107)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.1 (#35)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,396 | 1,107 |
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 69.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.1% |
| GBAEval | 6.7% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.7 (#16)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.3 (#45)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | 56% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.6% | 87.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1407 |
| DTBench | 94.7% | 87.7% |
| ForecastBench | 59 | 61 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 92.5% | — |
| CritPt | 13.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 50% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 25.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 4.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| LMCA | 47.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.55 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.5 (#30)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 30.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.3% | 60.9% |
| ProofBench | 31% | 4% |
| LMArena Math | 1502 | 1408 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 62.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#10)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 32.6 (#203)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1493 | 1398 |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.8% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#13)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1311 | 1201 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.1 (#12)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.1 (#110)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1525 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1490 | 1416 |
| LMArena German | 1500 | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1481 | 1347 |
| LMArena Korean | 1453 | 1361 |
| LMArena Russian | 1491 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1478 | 1411 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.2 (#29)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.8 (#127)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | 1376 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.3 (#39)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1481 | 1390 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#46)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.4 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1481 | 1408 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1467 | 1394 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1482 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1327 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1087 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Grok 4.1 Fast?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index. Grok 4.1 Fast costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Grok 4.1 Fast?

Grok 4.1 Fast is cheaper. It lists at $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash lists at $1.50 and $9.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.1 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Grok 4.1 Fast share?

27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.