# Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemma 3 4B

> Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 68× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-gemma-3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and Gemma 3 4B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 66.3 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 95.6% for Gemini 3.5 Flash and 7.5% for Gemma 3 4B.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $9 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 54.2 | 28.1 |
| Rank | 32 | 326 |
| Context | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | $0.04 |
| Output $/M | $9 | $0.08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49)
- Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | 1230 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.3% | — |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | — |
| SciCode | 53.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 911.02 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114)
- Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 19.6% |
| GBAEval | 6.7% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,396 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18)
- Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 50% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1253 |
| DTBench | 94.7% | 50.9% |
| LMCA | 47.1% | 2.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.46 | 116.02 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 25.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 92.5% | — |
| CritPt | 13.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 25.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 4.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36)
- Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 7.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1504 | 1239 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 62.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.3% | — |
| ProofBench | 31% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11)
- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | 23.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1495 | 1223 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.4% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15)
- Gemma 3 4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1310 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13)
- Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1476 | 1273 |
| LMArena German | 1492 | 1281 |
| LMArena Russian | 1493 | 1294 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1526 | — |
| LMArena French | 1490 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1486 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30)
- Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1467 | 1239 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38)
- Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1273 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47)
- Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1482 | 1291 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1470 | 1271 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | 1255 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1068 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1087 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Gemma 3 4B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 68× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Gemma 3 4B?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash lists at $1.50 and $9.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Gemma 3 4B better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemma 3 4B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 4B has 22.