# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 8B

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 8B costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-qwen3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3 8B in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 50.0 to 36.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 37.6% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 8.8% for Qwen3 8B.
- Qwen3 8B is cheaper at $0.18 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 33.3 |
| Rank | 113 | 237 |
| Context | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $0.70 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96)
- Qwen3 8B: 33.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 41.3% | 22.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82)
- Qwen3 8B: 29.9 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95)
- Qwen3 8B: 16.1 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 5% |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 59.7% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.12 | 136.17 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245)
- Qwen3 8B: 33.3 (#176)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 56.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1431 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66)
- Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#164)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1430 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | — |
| LMArena French | 1452 | — |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1440 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80)
- Qwen3 8B: 37.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Qwen3 8B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 8B costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 8B?

Qwen3 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 8B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.