# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.5-Flash

> Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 27

## Summary

- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 37.4 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 71.1% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 84.4% for Qwen3.5-Flash.
- Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 133 | 112 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $0.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1244 |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1412 |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | 221.8 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1403 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | 20% |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 82.9% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 29.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 143.98 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1407 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | 1368 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1400 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1392 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.