# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.5-9B

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5-9B costs 7.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-qwen3-5-9b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3.5-9B in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 25.7 to 14.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 41.3% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 27.5% for Qwen3.5-9B.
- Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Qwen3.5-9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 33.8 |
| Rank | 133 | 236 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $0.15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 35.9 (#217)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 41.3% | 27.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 14.5 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 9.2% |
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 23.1 (#182)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 12% |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 71.2% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 24.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 139.46 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 34.8 (#192)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 61.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 48.5% |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#84)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 79% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | — |
| LMArena French | 1451 | — |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Qwen3.5-9B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5-9B costs 7.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3.5-9B?

Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.5-9B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.