# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 14B

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3 14B in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 14B leads 38.6 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 83.3% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 63.8% for Qwen3 14B.
- Qwen3 14B is cheaper at $0.35 / $1.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 35.5 |
| Rank | 133 | 225 |
| Context | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $1.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 41.3% | 31.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107)
- Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 4% |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 64% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 138.23 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 66.4% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72)
- Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | — |
| LMArena French | 1451 | — |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Qwen3 14B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.40 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 14B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.