# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 50.1 to 24.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 71.1% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 7.4% for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 30.1 |
| Rank | 133 | 297 |
| Context | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 128.52 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 7.4% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | — |
| LMArena French | 1451 | — |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 32B Instruct lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.