# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen Plus

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Plus in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 50.1 to 27.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 71.1% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 17.8% for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 133 | 210 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1328 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1317 |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 81.1% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 24% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1326 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1328 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63)
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | — |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1336 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Qwen Plus?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen Plus share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.