# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 64.2 to 46.2.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 133 | 191 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1291 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1272 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1305 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1295 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1247 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1252 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.