# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiniMax-M2.7

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.7 costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 25

## Summary

- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 9 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 50.0 to 37.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 60.4% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 24.7% for MiniMax-M2.7.
- MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 37.4 |
| Rank | 113 | 188 |
| Context | 1.05M | 205K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1397 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 47% |
| WeirdML | 39% | 37% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1454 |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | 599.25 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | 24.7% |
| CritPt | 0% | 0.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1422 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.12 | 145.84 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 13% | 3% |
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1420 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1430 | 1443 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38)
- MiniMax-M2.7: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1428 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1439 |
| LMArena French | 1452 | 1422 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | 1261 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1440 | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1404 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1419 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1404 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1413 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than MiniMax-M2.7?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.7 costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.1 vs 41.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.