# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 38.3 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 41.3% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 133 | 138 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1330 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | 737.95 |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1420 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1396 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1404 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.