# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Llama 4 Scout

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index. Llama 4 Scout costs 5.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-llama-4-scout
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 28

## Summary

- They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 10 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 0 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 64.4 to 37.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 71.1% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 7.8% for Llama 4 Scout.
- Llama 4 Scout is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- Llama 4 Scout has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 27.4 |
| Rank | 113 | 323 |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $0.30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96)
- Llama 4 Scout: 19.9 (#334)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 41.3% | 17% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1286 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.1% |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82)
- Llama 4 Scout: 24.4 (#109)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.1% |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95)
- Llama 4 Scout: 9.2 (#339)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | 0% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | 0.5% |
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1266 |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 57.9% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 12% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.12 | 129.64 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245)
- Llama 4 Scout: 18.4 (#280)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 7.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1286 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 37.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 62.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66)
- Llama 4 Scout: 31.8 (#208)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 51.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1430 | 1236 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 74.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 50.7% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38)
- Llama 4 Scout: 31.6 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | 1118 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 34.2% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59)
- Llama 4 Scout: 41.3 (#207)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1428 | 1253 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1256 |
| LMArena French | 1452 | 1283 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1274 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | 1209 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1263 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1440 | 1277 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77)
- Llama 4 Scout: 66.0 (#212)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1248 |
| IFEval | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80)
- Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1265 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 36% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55)
- Llama 4 Scout: 37.1 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1279 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | 1249 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | 783 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1281 |
| WildBench | — | 78% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Llama 4 Scout?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index. Llama 4 Scout costs 5.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 19.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Llama 4 Scout share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.