# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Llama 2-70B

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-llama-2-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 50.0 to 7.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 71.1% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 0% for Llama 2-70B.
- Llama 2-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 24.1 |
| Rank | 113 | 343 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96)
- Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1079 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82)
- Llama 2-70B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95)
- Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1073 |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 41.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.12 | 113.59 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 64.9% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| ForecastBench | — | 51.4 |
| HellaSwag | — | 85.3% |
| LAMBADA | — | 78.9% |
| PIQA | — | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.2% |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245)
- Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 0% |
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1091 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.3% |
| GSM8K | — | 69.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66)
- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 26.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1430 | 1039 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.6% |
| MMLU | — | 69.9% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 60.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 87.6% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38)
- Llama 2-70B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59)
- Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1428 | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 994 |
| LMArena French | 1452 | 1089 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1041 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | 927 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 964 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1440 | 1142 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77)
- Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1071 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1062 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1088 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Llama 2-70B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 30.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Llama 2-70B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.